Would like to find out actual performance of AP Dongles vs Full size Routers. Can easily run 40/60 clients with full blown routers, need to know limitations if using this type AP Dongles either 150 or 300 Mbps.
We are operating in open classroom space, but would appreciate effect in both number of clients and distances reached if known.
We are using these devices as AP’s and they work great. We can test with up to 14 clients and videos run flawlessly. We have tested so far 7 USB dongles that can operate as AP’s, we just do not know how many clients over 14 will choke these AP’s.
We are planning to setup between 60 and close to 100 classrooms featuring around 30 clients each. Being able to use those USB AP dongles may result in savings over 10,000 US $ … major impact in project !!
That’s a big investment and a huge deployment… it should be enough reason to do some thorough hands-on testing before buying 100 devices But really, those devices don’t look like something you’d wanna run 30 clients on. I could be wrong, and I would recommend trying to look for experience with the new RPi3 because it has a broadcom WIFI chip that supports AP mode. Perhaps people have experience with it.
If you find a dongle with the same chip, it probably supports AP mode. But you also need a linux distribution with the right drivers to make it count.
So basically, if you buy these dongles and expect to make them work over a wider variety of devices and linux distributions (or Windows!?) then it’s a lot of uncertainty.
I’m not sure if you acknowledge the difference between AP mode and AD-Hoc mode, but it’s significant. I don’t think you can reliably connect 30 devices in an Ad-hoc network, nor can I recommend that you hand over unconventional and sort of “hacked” environments to schools and local system maintainers.
Regarding access points, you can also buy cheap APs. For instance, I have hundreds of dlink APs from a former ISP. I mean, just look for them, and you’ll find them. They are much easier to configure!
It’s over the top to spend $10,000 on 100 APs anyways, if you would go for such a low-spec device instead… you would be very well off spending ~$20 on real APs from a certified refurbisher. Preferably, but not mandatory, with a router function.
RPi’s are out of the question because schools already have Windows servers ready for this project. Actually have thousands of new desktop, laptop computers and tablets, unused due to lack of software and internet service. When I was talking about 10.000 $ I was referring to the differential between five dollar USB dongles and full blown routers. I am attaching a picture of four videos broadcasting thorough a 300 Mps EDUP Dong, and it is an under 10$ in the US, less if imported. This unit comes with solid Realtek software as in the picture, no hacks. Actually unit is sold as having an AP function, like quite a few other units we are testing. While of dual use, I am not sure you can qualify this as an AD-Hoc mode.
We certainly plan to do a lot of testing, but I am certainly interested in a way to find AP’s, are yours for sale ??
Do not need router functions, and would love to hear a source of potential refurbished AP’s.
If you pay for the shipping, I can also send you 150 dlink dir-635… they’re not the greatest in the world, and some of them may have issues from the factory. But they’d have to be shipped from Denmark, so not sure if this would really be relevant as you can get much newer refurbished equipment easily
Frank, I can share our experience in West Africa with RPi2 using USB WiFi dongles. They seem to work well with up to about 20 clients connected for accessing normal “RACHEL” content and even streaming Ka-Lite videos, but if students log in (which activates performance monitoring/logging) and access the math exercises, the system becomes VERY slow and many time-outs/disconnects if more than about 10 students work concurrently (Sometimes it chokes with as few as 6 connections). How much of this is due to the AP USB dongle and how much to the under-powered RPi processor is hard to say. We “upgraded” to the RACHEL Plus Content Access Point which Intel claims can handle 50 connections, and we find it exhibits the same symptoms when we exceed about 20 logged in connections doing Ka-Lite exercises, but it can stream to over 30 clients not logged in. Hope this helps you in your project.